ReviewCells2026
The Journey of Gene Therapy in Sickle Cell Disease: How Molecular Advances Meet Clinical Care.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a monogenic disorder responsible for recurrent vaso-occlusive crises, progressive organ damage, and shortened life expectancy. For decades, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from a matched sibling donor has been the only established cure, but its reach remains limited by donor availability and transplant-related toxicity. The approval of two autologous gene therapy products in 2023, exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) and lovotibeglogene autotemcel (lovo-cel), marked a turning point for the SCD population and the gene therapy field in general. This review proposes a molecular rationale for fetal hemoglobin reactivation and β-globin gene addition, describes the engineering of lentiviral and CRISPR-based platforms, and highlights the clinical evidence accumulated to date that demonstrated durable disease modification with acceptable short-term toxicity. We then assess the clinical positioning of gene therapy within the broader spectrum of curative options compared to current available treatments and address the financial, ethical and psychosocial barriers that limit access to gene therapy both within high-income countries and globally. Critical research priorities include long-term safety surveillance, comparative effectiveness studies, pediatric trials below 12 years, and validated patient-reported outcome instruments. Base editing, non-genotoxic conditioning, and in vivo delivery represent the most promising avenues to broaden access and reduce treatment burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.