Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193843›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Perceptions on the Economic Feasibility of Sustainable Roundworm Control Practices in Grazed Livestock-A Short Survey Among European Farmers and Veterinarians.

Hannah Njiriku Mwangi, Leen Lietaer, Edwin Claerebout, Laura Rinaldi, Antonio Bosco, Smaragda Sotiraki, Marcin Mickiewicz, Mahmut Sinan Erez, Esma Kozan, Annick Spaans and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Seroprevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Hannah Njiriku MwangiKreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, 9150 Kruibeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-0477
Leen LietaerDepartment of Social Sciences, ILVO, Burgemeester Van Gansberghelaan 92/1, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-5128
Edwin ClaereboutLaboratory of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Saliburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8292-2791
Laura RinaldiCREMOPAR, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0975-2052
Antonio BoscoCREMOPAR, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, 80137 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1266-2154
Smaragda SotirakiHellenic Agricultural Organisation-Dimitra (ELGO-DIMITRA), 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8357-5990
Marcin MickiewiczDivision of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9747-6803
Mahmut Sinan ErezFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200 Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7407-7383
Esma KozanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, 03200 Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9473-6198
Annick SpaansZLTO-Zuidelijke Land- en Tuinbouworganisatie Vereniging, 5222 Den Bosch, The Netherlands.
Carole ToczéIDELE-Institut de l'Élevage, 31321 Castanet-Tolosan, France.ORCID 0009-0005-6340-1201
Natascha MeunierAnimal Health Ireland, N41 WN27 Carrick-on Shannon, County Leitrim, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4775-0760
Maria Martínez ValladaresInstituto de Ganadería de Montaña, Animal Health Department, CSIC-University of Leon, Grulleros, 24346 León, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3723-1895
Jarosław KabaDivision of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7977-9875
Mickael BernardCIIRPO-Centre Interregional d'Information et de Recherche en Production Ovinele Mourie, 87260 Saint-Priest-Ligoure, France.ORCID 0009-0008-8882-5563
Adrian-Valentin PotârnicheDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7749-8543
Aija MalnieceClinical Institute, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, 3004 Jelgava, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-6404-3822
Tomas KupčinskasDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 47140 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0009-0001-5439-2148
Dave BartleyMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik EH26 0PZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8543-9244
Johannes CharlierKreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, 9150 Kruibeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1332-1458
Tong WangKreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, 9150 Kruibeke, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) continue to impose substantial health and productivity losses in grazing ruminants, and the accelerating emergence of anthelmintic resistance (AR) underscores the need for SWC strategies. Although multiple SWC approaches have been validated experimentally, their implementation across European livestock systems remains inconsistent, and limited evidence exists regarding the stakeholders' perceptions that affect decision-making. This study conducted a multilingual cross-sectional survey of 1261 respondents, including farmers, veterinarians, advisors, and other professionals, across 13 European countries to evaluate perceived worm-control cost burdens and the economic feasibility of seven SWC strategies. Descriptive and regression analyses revealed that a majority of respondents (56.7%) considered diagnostic testing to be financially reasonable, although perceptions varied significantly between countries. Sustainable anthelmintic use, quarantine and strategic screening, and grazing management were perceived as the most viable strategies, whereas biological control and bioactive compound-based approaches elicited greater uncertainty. An aggregated SWC Attitude Score demonstrated systematically higher acceptance among veterinarians compared to farmers, while male and older respondents exhibited lower levels of agreement across practices. The overall findings suggest that economic considerations may not be perceived as the primary barrier to sustainable worm control adoption, but other practical factors may potentially limit implementation.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal nematodesgrazing ruminantsmilk yieldsustainable worm controlweight gain

Identifiers

PMID42193843
PMCPMC13203688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.