ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Epigenetic Drift and the Generational Limit of Serial Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Pigs.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in pigs has been a widely used technique for producing gene-edited pigs for biomedical research, yet its wide-spread application through serial cloning remains markedly limited. Unlike in mice, where the serial cloning can be sustained across numerous generations, in pigs it is usually limited to only a few rounds. Specifically, porcine serial cloning has not been reported beyond three consecutive generations in live-born offspring, with blastocyst development rates declining from approximately 4.4% in G1 to 1-5% in G2-G3, and live-birth cloning efficiency (offspring/recipient) dropping sharply with each successive round. Compelling evidence suggests that cumulative epigenetic instability, incomplete embryo genome activation, DNA methylation reprogramming, persistent donor-cell memory, and imprinting disruption collectively erode transcriptional integrity across generations. Although several manipulations, including epigenetic modifiers, transiently improved the early development, they failed to sustain the reprogramming across several generations. Here, we synthesize comparative advances in serial cloning across species and propose that species-specific differences in chromatin plasticity and cytoplasmic reprogramming capacity define a porcine "reprogramming ceiling". Deciphering and overcoming this barrier will be critical for advancing sustainable livestock engineering, xenotransplantation and translational medicine biotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.