ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Coprophagy Couples Hindgut Fermentation with Multi-Site Microbial Organization in Brandt's Vole.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coprophagy, the ingestion of feces, is widespread among vertebrates and plays an important role in hindgut-fermenting herbivores by facilitating nutrient recycling and maintaining gut microbial stability. However, most studies have focused on cecal or fecal microbiota, with limited attention to microbial communities at other body sites. Here, we used Brandt's vole, a species exhibiting frequent coprophagic behavior, to examine how coprophagy prevention affects hindgut fermentation and microbial communities across multiple sites, including the tongue, lung, stomach, and cecum. Coprophagy prevention increased food intake but reduced body weight gain and significantly decreased cecal acetate, propionate, and butyrate concentrations. At the microbial level, coprophagy prevention increased the Simpson index of the tongue microbiota and induced modest compositional shifts in the tongue, lung, and stomach microbiota. In contrast, the cecal microbiota exhibited greater compositional and predicted functional changes. Notably, coprophagy prevention reduced the Bray-Curtis distance between tongue and cecal microbiota without altering the number of shared amplicon sequence variants. Together, these findings indicate that coprophagy not only promotes efficient nutrient recycling through hindgut fermentation but may also influence microbiota composition across behaviorally interconnected digestive niches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.