Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193774›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

From Concept to Perception: Equestrian Definitions of Harmony and Visual Attention in Horse-Rider Evaluation.

Inga A Wolframm, Madita Everding, Varvara Savulchyk, Jorinde Borssen, Debby D M Gudden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inga A WolframmApplied Research Centre, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0394-8417
Madita EverdingApplied Research Centre, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands.
Varvara SavulchykApplied Research Centre, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands.
Jorinde BorssenApplied Research Centre, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands.
Debby D M GuddenApplied Research Centre, Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences, 6880 GB Velp, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In equestrian circles, horse-rider harmony is understood intuitively, yet clear criteria are lacking. This study examined how different equestrians conceptualized and visually assessed harmony and how this influenced scoring. Qualitative interviews were combined with eye tracking technology. Thirty equestrians assessed five videos of horse-rider combinations performing in dressage, showjumping, eventing, working equitation and Icelandic riding, with eye movements being recorded using a mounted eye tracker. Verbal definitions were analyzed using thematic analysis, revealing three overarching themes: Horse Behavior, Horse-Rider Connection, and Rider Influence. Number of fixations and duration of fixation were reduced using principal component analysis (PCA), yielding five components each. These explained 70.9% and 64.5% of variance, respectively. Linear mixed-effects models showed significant effects for two PCA components: frequent fixation on the horse's ears and eyes relative to the horse's shoulder and rider leg predicted lower harmony scores (B = -0.34, SE = 0.13, z = -2.53,

Indexed as

equestrian sporteye trackingharmonyhorse–rider interactionjudging criteriaperceptionperformance evaluationvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID42193774
PMCPMC13203894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.