Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193729›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

The Effect of Duck Targeted Lighting Programs on Productivity, Health, and Welfare.

Parker B Watson, Emily Jiral, Melinda Grimes, Gregory S Archer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Parker B WatsonDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Emily JiralDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Melinda GrimesDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Gregory S ArcherDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-797X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the impact of a dynamic LED lighting program specifically tailored to Pekin ducks (DDYNs) compared to a conventional commercial lighting program (CON) on growth performance, health, stress, and fear responses. A total of 960 Pekin ducks were reared across two replicates. Production parameters including body weight, average daily gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio were recorded. Health was assessed via tibia breaking strength, bone ash content, complete blood cell count, and villus height to crypt depth ratio. Stress was evaluated through physical asymmetry, heterophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and plasma corticosterone concentration, while fear was measured using tonic immobility and inversion tests. No significant differences were observed in production or health parameters between treatments (

Indexed as

corticosteroneduckdynamic lightingfearLEDlight spectrumphotoperiodstresstonic immobilitywelfare

Identifiers

PMID42193729
PMCPMC13203875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.