Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193709›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Effects of Painting-Based Art Interventions on Mental Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Xu Song, Jihoon Jang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xu SongGlobal Fine Arts Department, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-9005-6554
Jihoon JangGlobal Fine Arts Department, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety, are rising globally, and while conventional therapies like medications and psychotherapy remain common, they face limitations, including side effects and accessibility. This highlights the need for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Painting-based art interventions are a promising non-pharmacological approach for improving scale-assessed mental health outcomes, but quantitative evidence across age groups and outcome types remains limited. This meta-analysis synthesizes data from 45 randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of painting-based art interventions on mental health. The study explores potential moderating factors such as intervention duration, type of art, gender, and age group. A rigorous quality assessment of included studies was performed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. The pooled effect size for painting-based interventions on mental health was significant, indicating a large positive impact. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions of various durations, art forms, and gender compositions produced similar effects. Notably, older adults benefited the most from these interventions. Painting-based art interventions were associated with improved scale-assessed mental health outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as evidence for one visual art-making approach within broader art therapy practice, rather than as defining art therapy solely by painting-based methods.

Indexed as

art interventiondepressionmental healthmeta-analysispainting-based interventionrandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID42193709
PMCPMC13203423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.