ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Painting-Based Art Interventions on Mental Health Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The psychological benefits of outdoor landscape sketching in higher art education: an extended SOR perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety, are rising globally, and while conventional therapies like medications and psychotherapy remain common, they face limitations, including side effects and accessibility. This highlights the need for effective non-pharmacological interventions. Painting-based art interventions are a promising non-pharmacological approach for improving scale-assessed mental health outcomes, but quantitative evidence across age groups and outcome types remains limited. This meta-analysis synthesizes data from 45 randomized controlled trials to assess the impact of painting-based art interventions on mental health. The study explores potential moderating factors such as intervention duration, type of art, gender, and age group. A rigorous quality assessment of included studies was performed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. The pooled effect size for painting-based interventions on mental health was significant, indicating a large positive impact. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions of various durations, art forms, and gender compositions produced similar effects. Notably, older adults benefited the most from these interventions. Painting-based art interventions were associated with improved scale-assessed mental health outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as evidence for one visual art-making approach within broader art therapy practice, rather than as defining art therapy solely by painting-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.