Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193702›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Cognitive Style Shaped by Framing: Implications for Rational vs. Intuitive Thinking.

Marcus Selart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marcus SelartDepartment of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, 5045 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7504-0873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article investigates how cognitive style shaped by framing influences rational and intuitive thinking. We extend existing research on cognitive styles, specifically the construct of holistic dependence/independence on framing, and examine its relationship with reasoning performance, self-rated intuition, and analytical intelligence. We conduct tests with university students and find that individuals with high holistic independence on framing perform better on rationality tests and are better predictors of rational thinking than traditional measures of intelligence. Additionally, holistic independence on framing was found to be marginally related to lower self-rated reliance on intuition. These findings suggest that holistic dependence/independence on framing may provide additional insight into reasoning styles beyond traditional intelligence measures, highlighting its potential relevance for understanding individual differences in decision-making processes.

Indexed as

analytical intelligencecognitive styleholistic dependence/independence on framingintuitionpersonalityrationality

Identifiers

PMID42193702
PMCPMC13203886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.