ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effects of Negative Meta-Stereotype on the Doctor-Patient Relationship: The Role of Imagined Intergroup Contact.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to explore the relationship between negative meta-stereotypes, intergroup anxiety, doctor-patient trust, and doctor-patient relationships and investigate the intervention impact of imagined intergroup contact through two experiments. Study 1 examined whether intergroup anxiety and doctor-patient trust sequentially mediate the effect of negative meta-stereotypes on the doctor-patient relationship. Two hundred participants were randomly assigned to a negative meta-stereotype activation or control group, and completed measures of intergroup anxiety, doctor-patient trust, and doctor-patient relationship quality. Study 2 built on these findings by testing imagined intergroup contact as a potential intervention. Following negative meta-stereotype activation, 184 participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: no imagination, imagined landscape, imagined contact with a professionalism-focused physician, or imagined contact with a care-focused physician. Study 1 revealed that negative meta-stereotype activation significantly increased intergroup anxiety, decreased doctor-patient trust, and impaired the doctor-patient relationship. Importantly, intergroup anxiety and doctor-patient trust played a chain mediating role in this relationship. Study 2 demonstrated that only imagined contact with a caring physician (but not a purely professional one) significantly reduced intergroup anxiety, enhanced doctor-patient trust, and improved the doctor-patient relationship. These findings provide evidence consistent with a serial emotional-cognitive pathway from intergroup anxiety to doctor-patient trust through which negative meta-stereotypes may impair the doctor-patient relationship, and by pinpointing emotional care as the core component that makes imagined intergroup contact effective in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.