ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The General Mechanism of Status: The Impact of Perceptual and Knowledge-Based Social Status on Selective Attention.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social status, a fundamental dimension of human social life, shapes access to resources and opportunities and influences how individuals perceive and interact with others. Perceivers can infer others' social status from both perceptual cues (e.g., clothing) and knowledge-based cues (e.g., biographical information), yet it remains unclear whether and how these distinct types of status cues influence early-stage attentional selection. To address this question, the present study employed a modified two-rectangle paradigm to examine the effects of social status on space- and object-based attention. Social status was manipulated via perceptual cues (Experiment 1: upper-body clothing) and knowledge-based cues (Experiment 2: fictive biographies), and three stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs: 100, 300, and 500 ms) were included to capture the temporal dynamics. The results showed that both perceptual and knowledge-based status selectively modulated object-based attention at the 300 ms SOA, with comparable effect magnitudes, whereas space-based attention remained unaffected. These findings suggest that social status operates as a higher-order modulatory factor that selectively influences object-based attentional selection within a temporally constrained window. Moreover, the comparable effects of perceptual and knowledge-based cues support the notion that different types of status cues are integrated into a general representational format that guides attentional priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.