Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193655›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Impact of a Technology-Assisted, Two-Month Breathing Exercise Intervention on Daily Affect, Weekly Stress and Examinational Stress.

Konrad Rudnicki, Glen Joris, Floortje Meyvis, Marthe Verschraegen, Karolien Poels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Konrad RudnickiThe Antwerp Social Lab, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5419-7457
Glen JorisThe Antwerp Social Lab, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4202-2641
Floortje MeyvisThe Antwerp Social Lab, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0009-0009-3562-7085
Marthe VerschraegenThe Antwerp Social Lab, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Karolien PoelsThe Antwerp Social Lab, University of Antwerp, 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-5276-0293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breathing exercises are a low-cost strategy for mitigating daily stress, yet their enhancement via haptic biofeedback devices remains under-explored. These devices may facilitate adaptive breathing by personalizing rhythms via providing haptic cues based on heart rate, blood oxygenation and heart rate variability. We conducted a 2-month longitudinal trial with 62 healthy participants (Mage=26.9±8.1 years; 81% female) to test whether a haptic breath pacer ("Moonbird") augments the stress-reducing effects of breathing exercises. Participants were randomized to: (1) haptic feedback + app, (2) app-only, or (3) a no-exercise control. Ecological Momentary Assessment tracked daily affect (valence/arousal) and weekly stress. Students (n=45) also reported pre-examination stress. Between-subjects analyses revealed no condition effects on measured outcomes. However, within-subjects analyses showed that participants who felt higher arousal and valence but performed their breathing exercises felt a significant reduction in arousal and increase of valence on the following day. In the haptic group, these effects were moderated by user experience, indicating that benefits are contingent on device usability. Finally, highly stressed students who performed more exercises reported lower examination stress at the end of the semester, irrespective of their assigned condition.

Indexed as

academic stressbreathing exercisesecological momentary assessmenthaptic biofeedbackstress

Identifiers

PMID42193655
PMCPMC13203411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.