ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Critical Review of Children in Rural Latin America: Toward Meaningful Engagement in Complex Research Contexts.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Participatory research with children has expanded globally; however, existing reviews predominantly focus on Western and urban contexts, offering limited insight into rural Latin American settings. A critical literature review was conducted to examine participatory research with children and adolescents in rural Latin America between 2018 and 2025, focusing on the reported sociodemographic characteristics, research phases and degree of children's participation. Sixteen empirical studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings indicate that while participatory methods are widely used, decision-making authority remains concentrated in adults during early stages, with children's involvement often limited to implementation and dissemination. The analysis reveals that the redistribution of power operates across three interrelated levels: (1) structural-methodological conditions, characterized by institutional and territorial pre-structuring and the invisibility of sociodemographic interactions; (2) relational-community dynamics, involving community hierarchies, cultural norms, and institutional actors; and (3) experiential-child engagement, where shifting roles reflect the varying degrees of agency children exercise throughout the process. Addressing these levels in an integrated manner is critical, as it is through their alignment that the redistribution of power can move beyond procedural inclusion toward more meaningful forms of participation. In this sense, meaningful participation requires a transition in which children are able to recognize themselves as active social agents and meaning-makers who can influence and shape the trajectory of research. Building on this, the study argues that such involvement depends not only on redistributing power but on employing analytical frameworks that resonate with children's lived realities and their diverse social positions within rural territories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.