ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Behavioral Indicators and Verbal Judgments in the Perception of Translation Quality: A Cognitive Experimental Study.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning-Behavioral Affordances in German Textbooks: Sustainability-Oriented Intercultural Competence Development in China.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the cognitive dynamics of translation-related evaluation by comparing online behavioral responses with retrospective verbal reports. Using a 2 × 2 within-subject design, 44 Chinese-English bilingual participants evaluated English translations of Chinese haiku-like texts in a judgment task. Two factors were manipulated: phrase order (congruent vs. incongruent) and local semantic expression type (literal vs. non-literal). Response times (RTs), rating scores, and post-task interview data were collected. The results showed a divergence across indicators. Phrase order significantly affected both RTs and rating scores, with congruent structures associated with faster responses and higher ratings. However, most participants did not report phrase order as a relevant factor in their verbal explanations. In contrast, semantic expression type influenced RTs but did not produce reliable differences in rating scores. Importantly, a significant interaction between phrase order and semantic expression type was observed in rating data but not in RTs. This pattern suggests that sensitivity to local semantic variation may depend on structural processing conditions during evaluative judgment. These findings indicate that behavioral indicators and verbal judgments capture different aspects of translation-related processing and evaluation. While RTs provide a sensitive index of processing effort, rating scores reflect more global evaluative outcomes, and verbal reports capture participants' retrospective interpretations. These findings are discussed within the framework of dual-system theory, demonstrating how implicit cognitive processing (primarily indexed by response times) and explicit conscious reflections offer complementary insights into the perception of translation quality. The findings also highlight the value of combining behavioral and metacognitive methods in studying translation evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.