ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Baseline Quantitative Analysis of Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence Against Women with Disabilities in South Africa.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of digital technologies has transformed the landscape of gender-based violence globally. This quantitative study used an online survey to explore the experiences of women with disabilities in relation to technology-facilitated gender-based violence (TFGBV) in South Africa. Findings from 204 participants highlight patterns across age, province, education, employment, income, disability type, and forms of TFGBV experienced, and how TFGBV may differ at intersections of these factors. They show that cyberbullying, hacking, and hate speech were the most prevalent forms of TFGBV, disproportionately affecting women with various disabilities. The study further reveals how socio-economic disadvantage, manifested in limited access to secure technologies, digital literacy, and support systems, intensifies exposure to harm and constrains access to justice. The study calls for inclusive, power-conscious approaches to research, policy and interventions that centre lived experiences of women with disabilities. Addressing TFGBV in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), therefore, requires not only legal reform and digital safety initiatives but also broader strategies for socio-economic empowerment and systemic transformation to end gendered-disability violence in both the material and virtual world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.