ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Why Do Consumers Who Prefer Physical Entertainment Behave Digitally? Understanding the Preference-Behavior Gap.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the discrepancy between stated preferences and actual behavior in entertainment consumption, with a particular focus on the role of perceived accessibility constraints. While literature suggests that factors such as time and cost may hinder the translation of preferences into behavior, the direction of this relationship remains unclear. Using survey data from 608 respondents, the analysis investigates why individuals who express a preference for physical entertainment often exhibit higher levels of digital consumption. To address this question, the study constructs composite indices capturing physical consumption (PCI), digital consumption (DCI), and perceived accessibility constraints (PACI), and estimates a series of logistic regression models to identify the determinants of the preference-behavior gap. The results reveal that perceived accessibility constraints have a statistically significant effect on behavioral inconsistency. However, contrary to initial expectations, the relationship is negative, indicating that higher perceived constraints are associated with a lower probability of exhibiting a preference-behavior gap. In contrast, gender differences remain significant, while consumption intensity measures do not explain the observed discrepancy. These findings suggest that the preference-behavior gap is shaped less by actual consumption patterns and more by how individuals perceive the feasibility of engaging in their preferred activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.