ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Stage-Specific Animate Attention Bias in Individuals with High and Low Autistic Traits: Behavioral and Eye-Tracking Evidence.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animate attention bias reflects the visual system's tendency to prioritize animate over inanimate stimuli. This bias is reduced in autism spectrum disorder (ASD), suggesting that similar patterns may also be observed in individuals with high autistic traits (AT). Although previous research has reported reduced animate attention bias during early attentional orienting in individuals with high AT, how this bias unfolds across processing stages remains unclear. Using a dot-probe task combined with eye-tracking, the present study examined this stage-related pattern in individuals with high and low AT. Response time results showed that the low AT group had a significant animate-probe advantage, whereas the high AT group showed no significant advantage, broadly replicating prior findings. In stage-wise analyses, the low AT group showed a significant animate-probe advantage at the late stage, whereas the high AT group showed no significant advantage at either stage. However, this group difference was not reflected in most fixation-based measures. This RT-fixation dissociation suggests that reduced animate attention bias in high AT should not be interpreted simply as reduced overt fixation allocation to animate stimuli, but may reflect differences in using animacy-related cue-location information to facilitate subsequent probe detection and response selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.