Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193613›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

How Bodily Interaction Shapes Creativity: Two Experiments on Direction and Type.

Jiajia Su, Haosheng Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiajia SuSchool of Educational Science, Jiangsu Second Normal University, Nanjing 211200, China.ORCID 0009-0002-3624-7008
Haosheng YeThe Center for Embodied Cognition, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China.ORCID 0009-0008-5062-685X

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China Later-stage Funding Project "Artificial Intelligence and Psychology" 25FSHB027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the challenges in embodied creativity research, this study innovatively developed a new mirror game experimental paradigm based on the dual theoretical framework of embodied metaphor and enactive metaphor. From the perspective of embodied metaphor, the study investigates how "body interaction direction" (imitation vs. avoidance) influences delayed creativity. From the perspective of enactive metaphor, it examines how "body interaction type" (leader-follower vs. Joint Improvisation) shapes immediate creativity and reveals the overall effects of their interaction on creativity. Two experiments were conducted in this study: Experiment 1 focused on virtual human-machine interaction, and Experiment 2 explored real-life human-human interaction. Experiment 1 validated the synergistic effects of body interaction direction and type on individual creativity dimensions, with Joint Improvisation showing significant advantages. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that embodied and enactive metaphors exhibit significant synergistic effects on group creativity, with the leader-follower interaction pattern showing distinct value in the context of interaction effects. The general discussion highlights that embodied and enactive metaphors, as dual mechanisms, provide a theoretical breakthrough for understanding creativity, spanning human-machine and human-human interactions. Within the framework of enactive cognition, this study further expands the sense-making function of metaphor theory in creativity development.

Indexed as

body interactioncreativityembodied metaphorenactive metaphor

Identifiers

PMID42193613
PMCPMC13203492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.