ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Factors Associated with Dropout Intention in Engineering Education: A Learning Interpretable Modeling Approach.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dropout in higher education remains a persistent challenge with academic, institutional, and social consequences. Identifying students' dropout intention before formal withdrawal occurs may provide useful evidence for preventive support strategies. This study examines dropout intention among undergraduate engineering students at a Chilean university. Using survey data from 189 students, five variables were operationalized: personal self-regulation, mental health, institutional perception, socio-economic conditions, and academic motivation. Two interpretable models were estimated: multivariable logistic regression and a shallow decision tree. The logistic regression model showed satisfactory explanatory capacity and identified socio-economic conditions and personal self-regulation as significant protective predictors of dropout intention, while mental health, institutional perception, and academic motivation were not significant after adjustment. The decision tree provided a complementary rule-based segmentation and confirmed the prominence of socio-economic conditions and personal self-regulation, while also indicating a secondary contribution of mental health. These findings suggest that dropout intention in engineering education is shaped primarily by structural conditions and self-regulatory resources rather than by institutional perception or academic motivation alone. The study provides empirically grounded evidence to support early identification and student support strategies in higher education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.