ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Leverage Points for Wellbeing and Achievement in Vocational Education: A Network Analysis of Psychological Factors Across Gender and Majors.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate complex links among a large set of anxiety-related variables and identify targets for well-being interventions in a large sample of male and female vocational education training students. In total, 28 psychological constructs, such as self-esteem, parental pressure and dissatisfaction and motivation, were assessed in four groups of VET students (mode age: 16). The sample included 3069 females in ASSP schools (nursing and caring); 2108 females and 1772 males in Commerce schools (sales and management); and 2262 males in MELEC schools (electricity and maintenance). We used Gaussian Graphical models (GGMs) that allow for building sparse models of links among multiple variables and detecting targets for interventions via the identification of the most central nodes. We showed gender differences in absolute means for some variables (higher self-esteem and math grades in males; higher anxiety and error sensitivity, but stronger endorsement of mastery approach achievement goals in females), as well as in network structure. GGMs suggested that the key nodes were self-reported math competence for females in the ASSP group, self-regulation for females in Commerce, and mastery approach goals for males in both MELEC and Commerce groups, and that these should be differentially targeted by educational interventions in these populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.