ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Age Differences in the Relationship Between Interoception and Emotional Processing.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how bodily signals shape emotional cognition across adulthood is critical for explaining age-related changes in emotional learning and memory. This study investigated age-related differences in interoceptive sensitivity and emotional associative memory. Interoceptive sensitivity was used as an umbrella term to refer to sensitivity to internal bodily signals across interoceptive accuracy, attention, beliefs, and insight, while emotional associative memory was defined as the ability to learn and remember emotional face-name associations. Forty younger (18-39 years) and forty older (60-85 years) adults completed behavioural and self-report interoceptive measures alongside an emotional face-name learning, recall, and recognition paradigm. No significant age differences emerged for interoceptive accuracy, attention, or insight. However, older adults reported greater trust in, and less worry about, bodily sensations, indicating selective changes in interoceptive beliefs. Older adults also showed a robust positivity bias, learning, recalling, and recognising happy face-name pairs more accurately and faster than angry or neutral pairs, whereas younger adults showed uniform performance across emotional conditions. Interoception-emotion relationships differed by age: Young adults' interoceptive attention was positively associated with learning neutral pairs, while older adults' interoceptive accuracy correlated with better encoding and recall of angry pairs. These findings demonstrate that age-related differences in emotional associative memory are partly rooted in changes to interoceptive processing and extend Socioemotional Selectivity Theory by identifying interoception as a physiological contributor to the positivity bias in ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.