ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Influences of Different Types of Interpersonal Synchronization on the Cooperative Behavior of Chinese Children.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cooperation is an important influencing factor for individual morality and harmonious social development. Currently, most scholars select adult samples and adopt laboratory research methods. They have found that compared with asynchronous behavior, interpersonal synchronization (including both intentional and incidental synchronization) is significantly associated with higher levels of cooperative behavior. Does this conclusion apply to Chinese children? Childhood is a critical period for the development of cooperative abilities. Therefore, more effective educational approaches for fostering cooperation should be explored and adopted to promote children's cooperative behaviors. This study randomly selected 193 students aged 8-11 (95 boys and 98 girls, M = 9.74, SD = 1.16) from 5 primary schools in a city. Based on a 2 (intentional synchronization, incidental synchronization) × 3 (measurement occasion) mixed design, a field experiment was conducted to explore the effects of different types of interpersonal synchronization on children's cooperative behavior. However, the results showed that neither asynchronous behavior nor incidental synchronization significantly improved children's cooperative behavior. However, the level of cooperative behavior under intentional synchronization conditions was significantly higher than that under incidental synchronization conditions. This characteristic may be related to China's long-standing collectivistic education, which can help educators reflect on and optimize their cooperation education practices. This finding deserves attention from cooperation researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.