Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193525›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Memory-Based or Experience-Based? Subject-Object Asymmetry in Mandarin Relative Clause Processing from the Aging Perspective.

Xinmiao Liu, Jiani Shi, Shengqi Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinmiao LiuNational Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China.
Jiani ShiNational Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China.
Shengqi WuSchool of English for Specific Purposes, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China.

Funding

National Social Science Major Bidding Project of China 22&ZD298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processing difficulty of subject relative clauses (SRCs) and object relative clauses (ORCs) in Mandarin Chinese has been a controversial issue in psycholinguistics. Memory-based accounts and experience-based accounts make contrastive predictions regarding the processing asymmetry. Given that older adults tend to have lower memory and richer language experience, the processing of relative clauses in older adults can reveal which theoretical account offers a more adequate explanation of sentence comprehension. The present study compared the processing of Mandarin SRCs and ORCs in older and younger adults using a self-paced reading paradigm. The results revealed that both groups showed lower accuracy for SRCs than ORCs, but this effect was larger in older adults. These age-related differences cannot be attributed to different strategic trade-off mechanisms and task experience. During online processing, older adults performed more slowly than younger adults, but no significant interaction was found between age and RC type. These findings suggest that aging affects sentence comprehension at the post-interpretive and decision processes, while online syntactic processing remains relatively preserved but globally slowed. The findings are largely consistent with memory-based accounts, indicating that age-related changes in sentence comprehension may be attributed to memory decline in older adults.

Indexed as

agingMandarin Chineserelative clausessentence processingsubject-object asymmetry

Identifiers

PMID42193525
PMCPMC13203290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.