ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fine-Grained Intelligent Learning Diagnosis Model Based on the Exercise-Knowledge-Cognition Tensor for Educational Assessment.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate and interpretable learning diagnosis is increasingly required in AI-enabled educational assessment. Existing cognitive diagnostic models typically represent item attributes with a binary Q-matrix and infer mastered or not mastered knowledge states. Although polytomous extensions allow graded mastery, item attributes rarely encode theory-aligned cognitive-process demands, which limits pedagogical interpretation of diagnosed profiles. This study aims to operationalize revised Bloom's taxonomy at the exercise-knowledge level by constructing an Exercise-Knowledge-Cognition tensor and to develop RLDM-EKC as a DINA-type cognitive diagnosis model that infers ordered knowledge-cognition profiles. The model defines EKC-based ideal responses, estimates slip and guess parameters with an Expectation-Maximization procedure, and derives learner profiles using Maximum A Posteriori inference with uncertainty summaries. We validate the approach on synthetic data and on TIMSS 2007 Grade 4 mathematics data, comparing against classical CDMs including DINA, PA-DINA, and pG-DINA. In simulation, RLDM-EKC attains a PMR of 81.7% and an AAMR of 91.6%, and in empirical data, it yields theory-aligned multi-level cognitive profiles with transparent uncertainty reporting. These properties support actionable, human-in-the-loop feedback for teachers and learners under realistic deployment constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.