ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Conducting Evaluations in the Context of Tertiary Prevention of Youth Crime: Reflections from the Youth Endowment Fund.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serious youth violence is a public health issue nationally in the UK and internationally. The Youth Endowment Fund (YEF) was established in March 2019, with a £200 million endowment and a ten-year mandate, with a mission to prevent children and young people from becoming involved in violence. This article gives an overview of YEF's successes and challenges to date, focusing specifically on the experience of evaluating tertiary interventions. After providing an overview of YEF's approach to funding and evaluation, the article summarises YEF's work focused on tertiary prevention, including: work to test interventions already being implemented in the UK; adapting and evaluating evidence-based interventions from other jurisdictions in the UK; innovations in a group approach to carrying out evaluations; and embedding a focus on racial equity in tertiary prevention. Next, the article discusses the design issues involved in high-quality evaluation of tertiary prevention, including the scale required and the processes for obtaining consent from young people to participate in evaluations. The article then documents the many challenges and lessons learned from implementing tertiary prevention evaluations, especially focusing on the recruitment and retention of young people. Finally, the article discusses the lessons and places them in a wider context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.