Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42193441›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2026

Evolution of Concepts Regarding the Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP)-Positive Extracellular Vesicles.

Natalia Yunusova, Dmitry Svarovsky, Polina Panfilova, Anastasia Ryabova, Evgeniya Kaigorodova, Evgeniya Sidenko, Polina Gervas, Aleksey Molokov, Irina Kondakova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Natalia YunusovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4595-4177
Dmitry SvarovskyCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8985-009X
Polina PanfilovaClinical and Diagnostic Laboratory, Medical Association Family Medicine Center, 22B, Trifonova str., 634050 Tomsk, Russia.
Anastasia RyabovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7171-8728
Evgeniya KaigorodovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-6915
Evgeniya SidenkoCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-9459
Polina GervasCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.
Aleksey MolokovCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1475-1185
Irina KondakovaCancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 5, Kooperativny str., 634009 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0947-8778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review demonstrates that the diagnostic and prognostic significance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is not limited to its use as a marker of astrocytic damage but should also be considered in the context of the diversity of GFAP isoforms, their heterogeneous tissue-specific expression and their pronounced association with extracellular vesicles (EVs). The data presented in this review indicate that GFAP-positive (GFAP+) EVs possess broad clinical relevance in both acute and chronic pathologies of the nervous system, including ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, glioblastoma, and potentially diabetic and drug-induced polyneuropathy. Particular attention is given to the critical analysis of methodological approaches for studying GFAP+ EVs, including discussion of their proposed biogenesis, mechanisms of intravesicular incorporation of cytoskeletal fragments, and the hypothetical sorption of GFAP within the vesicular protein corona. A principal conclusion of this work is that, despite the high translational potential of GFAP+ vesicles as a novel liquid biopsy platform, further implementation of this approach in clinical practice will require standardization of EV isolation protocols, harmonization of phenotyping methodologies in accordance with MISEV 2023 recommendations, and large-scale prospective studies aimed at validating the biological nature, origin, and clinical reproducibility of identified GFAP-associated vesicular subpopulations.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseastrocyte-derived extracellular vesiclesexosomesextracellular vesiclesGFAPglioblastoma multiformeprotein coronaSchwann cellsstroketraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42193441
PMCPMC13204029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.