ReviewBiomedicines2026
Evolution of Concepts Regarding the Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP)-Positive Extracellular Vesicles.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review demonstrates that the diagnostic and prognostic significance of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is not limited to its use as a marker of astrocytic damage but should also be considered in the context of the diversity of GFAP isoforms, their heterogeneous tissue-specific expression and their pronounced association with extracellular vesicles (EVs). The data presented in this review indicate that GFAP-positive (GFAP+) EVs possess broad clinical relevance in both acute and chronic pathologies of the nervous system, including ischemic stroke, traumatic brain injury, glioblastoma, and potentially diabetic and drug-induced polyneuropathy. Particular attention is given to the critical analysis of methodological approaches for studying GFAP+ EVs, including discussion of their proposed biogenesis, mechanisms of intravesicular incorporation of cytoskeletal fragments, and the hypothetical sorption of GFAP within the vesicular protein corona. A principal conclusion of this work is that, despite the high translational potential of GFAP+ vesicles as a novel liquid biopsy platform, further implementation of this approach in clinical practice will require standardization of EV isolation protocols, harmonization of phenotyping methodologies in accordance with MISEV 2023 recommendations, and large-scale prospective studies aimed at validating the biological nature, origin, and clinical reproducibility of identified GFAP-associated vesicular subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.