ArticleBiomedicines2026
Microbiome-Based Therapies in Ulcerative Colitis: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and a Precision-Medicine Framework.
Article in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacomicrobiomics-driven targeted drug delivery for precision microbiome modulation.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- Commentary on "Five-Year Outcomes and Disease Trajectories in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Korean Multicenter Inception Cohort".Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches (3rd Edition).Biomedicines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome-based therapies are reshaping the therapeutic landscape for ulcerative colitis (UC), offering new avenues for disease management beyond conventional immunomodulatory and biologic treatments. UC remains a chronic, relapsing condition with significant unmet clinical needs, as many patients fail to achieve sustained remission or experience adverse effects with current therapies. The gut microbiome has emerged as a central contributor to UC pathogenesis, influencing epithelial barrier integrity, immune homeostasis, and metabolic signaling. Interventions such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and defined microbial consortia have demonstrated proof-of-concept efficacy in early-phase clinical trials, each leveraging distinct mechanistic strategies. FMT, as a broad ecological intervention, restores microbial diversity and functional redundancy, potentially addressing multiple pathogenic mechanisms simultaneously. In contrast, defined consortia enable precise targeting of specific metabolic and immunological pathways, including short-chain fatty acid production, bile-acid remodeling, epithelial barrier reinforcement, immune modulation, and succinate degradation. Recent clinical evidence suggests that consortia with broader mechanistic coverage may achieve more consistent biological activity than narrowly focused designs. This review synthesizes mechanistic and clinical insights across broad and defined microbial consortia, integrates evidence from randomized controlled trials and early-phase LBP studies, and outlines a precision-medicine framework to guide therapy selection. We highlight the importance of aligning therapeutic mechanisms with patient-specific microbial, metabolic, and immune profiles, and discuss future directions including biomarker-guided stratification, hybrid consortia, and adaptive trial designs. Advancing both broad and defined approaches, while incorporating ecological principles, mechanistic understanding, and patient stratification, will be essential to realizing the full therapeutic potential of microbiome-based therapies in UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.