ReviewCancers2026
Circulating Tumor DNA in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Framework for Precision Perioperative Management.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk factors for recurrence after initial transurethral resection of bladder tumor in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) presents distinct diagnostic and therapeutic challenges because of its rarity, anatomic constraints, frequent understaging at biopsy, and risk of systemic recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. Current perioperative management is driven primarily by clinicopathologic risk factors, which may be insufficient to identify occult molecular residual disease (MRD) or to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from systemic therapy. This narrative review summarizes available evidence on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in UTUC and related urothelial carcinoma settings, classifies the level of evidence supporting each application, and proposes a research framework for prospective evaluation. The strongest UTUC-specific evidence supports ctDNA as a prognostic biomarker associated with recurrence risk, whereas predictive validity for selecting chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, targeted therapy, or surveillance intensity remains unproven. Evidence from muscle-invasive bladder cancer, including ctDNA-correlative and ctDNA-guided perioperative trials, provides biologic rationale but should not be directly translated into routine UTUC care without disease-specific validation. We outline key implementation questions, including target population, assay selection, timing, false-positive and false-negative results, lead-time bias, and integration of plasma ctDNA with utDNA. Prospective UTUC-specific trials are needed to determine whether ctDNA-guided perioperative strategies improve survival, reduce unnecessary toxicity, and are cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.