ReviewCancers2026
Breast Cancer Milieu Maneuvers Cancer-Associated Macrophages to Synergize Neoplastic Repertoires.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the most devastating malignancies in women worldwide. A growing body of evidence has linked neoplastic growth, invasion, metastasis, immune escape, and therapeutic resistance to infiltrating tumor-associated macrophages. In a breast cancer mass, macrophages are largely polarized to two main subtypes, M1 and M2, albeit with continuum intermediates, based on their immunological behaviors, gene signatures, and functional roles. While the former portrays proinflammatory and anti-cancer effects, the latter elicits the opposite impacts. M2 macrophages have gained rising attention as they are largely involved in fostering an immune-suppressive, cancer-promoting landscape and are imperative for malignant features across breast cancer subtypes. Through a positive feedback paracrine loop, M2 macrophages can be enriched by a plethora of dysregulated oncogenic signaling mediators, exemplified by CSF1/CSF1R, STAT3, IL-6, YAP, PI3K, PDK1, and AKT. These modulators could be released from or activated by surrounding malignant cells, fibroblasts, secreted extracellular vesicles, cell fragments generated after chemotherapies, hypoxia, dysregulated immune checkpoint pathways or oncometabolites. This review aims to discern the molecular cues fortifying M2 subpopulations. Moreover, recent advances in single-cell sequencing, spatial, and computational approaches have refined the understanding of TAM heterogeneity, while clinical translation remains limited by low therapeutic specificity, compensatory signaling, and differences between murine and human macrophage biology. Future therapeutic regimens should include strategies aimed at correcting aberrations that favor M2 polarization and are justified with divergences between humans and mice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.