ArticleCancers2026
Population-Level Resources and Costs Associated with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study was conducted to evaluate the population-level healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) either on active surveillance (AS) or not on AS, in which AS was defined as receiving no treatment within 1 year of diagnosis and two biopsies.
methodsAS men aged 40 to 105 years, diagnosed with stage I or II PCa, had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level < 20 ng/mL, a Gleason score between 5 and 7, and were matched (1:1) with men not receiving AS. The index date is defined as the date 1 year after PCa diagnosis. HCRU and costs were assessed using a macro-based costing methodology and costs standardized to 2023 CAD. Means (SD) and medians (interquartile ranges) per person-year values were reported annually.
resultsDuring the year leading up to the index date, the mean number of HCRU per patient-year (PPY) was significantly lower for the AS cases versus non-AS in terms of cancer clinic visits (1.7 vs. 26.7), hospital outpatient clinic visits (3.6 vs. 4.9), all physician visits (16.3 vs. 17.5), and specialist visits (10.7 vs. 11.6). The mean overall cost PPY was $6100 ± $12,400 for AS cases and $10,400 ± $17,800 for non-AS men (median overall cost PPY= $3500 [IQR: $2100-$5700] vs. $3700 [IQR: $2100-$7200] (
conclusionsHCRU and costs calculated for AS and non-AS low-risk PCa men indicate the cost savings potential for AS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.