ReviewCancers2026
Primary Cutaneous Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma: A Review of Diagnosis and Treatment for the General Oncologist.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL) is a type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) classified as a CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder along with lymphomatoid papulosis. Although it is the second most common subtype of CTCL after mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome, it remains rare, with an incidence of fewer than 0.5 cases per million person-years. Despite its histologic similarity to systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma, pcALCL follows a largely indolent course with excellent outcomes, with disease-specific survival rates of 86-95% in contemporary series. This narrative review summarizes the clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and management of pcALCL based on a semi-structured literature search, with emphasis on prospective studies and clinically relevant retrospective data. Diagnosis remains challenging due to overlap with other CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders and reactive conditions, requiring careful clinicopathologic correlation and exclusion of systemic disease. While regional lymph node involvement may be present, available evidence suggests it does not significantly impact prognosis, highlighting the importance of avoiding overtreatment. Management strategies are guided by disease extent, with strong evidence supporting skin-directed therapies, particularly radiation, for localized disease. For multifocal or relapsed disease, brentuximab vedotin demonstrates the most robust prospective data and has reshaped the treatment landscape; however, alternative systemic therapies, including methotrexate and retinoids, remain relevant in selected patients. Overall, current management is supported largely by non-randomized data, and key gaps remain in risk stratification, optimal sequencing of therapies, and management of uncommon aggressive variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.