ReviewCancers2026
Parenchyma-Sparing Pancreatic Surgery: Current Indications, Results, and Future Prospects.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm (IPMN) of the Pancreas: History, Myths, and Realities Between Past and Future.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic surgery (PSPS) is a patient-centered alternative to traditional radical resections for benign and low-grade pancreatic lesions. Unlike pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy, which tend to cause long-term exocrine and endocrine deficiency, PSPS aims to preserve functional tissue with a guarantee of oncologic safety. Techniques such as enucleation, central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving head resection, and uncinectomy are illustrative of this equipoise, with less risk of new-onset diabetes and malabsorption but more short-term morbidity in the form of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Advances in imaging technology, minimally invasive procedures, and robotics technology have extended PSPS indications beyond conventional candidates to thoughtfully selected neuroendocrine tumors, cystic neoplasms, and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. Results are strongly dependent on patient selection, surgeon experience, and institutional volume, highlighting the importance of centralization and subspecialist training. While oncologic proficiency remains essential in aggressive tumors, evidence is in favor of PSPS being a curative and function-preserving option for properly screened patients with low-grade or benign conditions. Priorities for the future include multicenter prospective trials, optimization of perioperative techniques, and inclusion of patient-reported outcomes. PSPS represents a paradigm shift in pancreatic surgery, where technical innovation is balanced with quality of life in the long term and evolving principles of modern, individualized surgical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.