ReviewBrain sciences2026
Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Based on Intracranial Compliance: Toward Personalized Decision-Making.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional surgical decision-making in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has relied on static intracranial pressure (ICP) thresholds and fixed volumetric criteria, an approach that inadequately reflects the dynamic physiological nature of secondary brain injury. These conventional metrics fail to capture the critical determinant of clinical deterioration: the progressive loss of intracranial compliance, the brain's capacity to buffer additional volume without harmful pressure escalation. This manuscript proposes a practical, compliance-based framework for selecting precise, personalized surgical strategies using real-time physiological, imaging, and neuromonitoring indicators. Based on the Intracranial Compartment Syndrome (ICCS) model, this approach translates the loss of compensatory reserve into actionable operative decisions. Compliance is assessed through multimodal tools, including ICP waveform morphology, cerebral oxygenation, and complementary noninvasive neuromonitoring. ICCS staging delineates three operative contexts: Stage 1, preserved compliance; Stage 2, compliance failure with maintained oxygenation requiring physiology-guided interventions to restore buffering capacity; and Stage 3, global decompensation with lost of compliance plus oxygenation failure requiring immediate, aggressive intervention for partial or total brain tissue survival. By shifting surgical reasoning from fixed anatomical thresholds to a physiology-centered assessment of intracranial compliance, this framework aims to enhance the timing, selection, and overall effectiveness of neurosurgical interventions in TBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.