ReviewBrain sciences2026
Chapter 1: The Natural History of Intracranial Aneurysms.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms are common vascular lesions with a highly variable natural history. While most unruptured intracranial aneurysms remain stable throughout life, a biologically aggressive subset progresses to growth and rupture, resulting in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with substantial morbidity and mortality. Contemporary evidence demonstrates that aneurysm behavior is dynamic rather than static and reflects the interaction of hemodynamic forces, inflammatory vascular remodeling, genetic susceptibility, and environmental risk factors. Rupture risk is not constant over time and may be highest early after aneurysm formation, followed by a period of relative quiescence in selected lesions. Traditional population-based risk estimates have therefore evolved toward individualized risk stratification incorporating aneurysm size, location, morphology, growth, patient-specific factors, and emerging imaging and computational biomarkers. This chapter reviews the epidemiology, pathobiology, growth patterns, and rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms, integrating foundational observational studies with recent advances in genetics, vessel wall imaging, and predictive modeling. Understanding the natural history of brain aneurysms is essential for balancing the risks of observation against intervention and for guiding future innovations in aneurysm management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.