ArticleBrain sciences2026
Firefighters' Expertise in Locating Sounds.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFirefighters search for survivors in low-visibility environments and have documented expertise in spatial orientation and wayfinding. No studies so far have investigated their ability to make use of auditory spatial cues.
methodsThe performance of 41 professional firefighters and 24 control subjects to localise sounds played in a dark environment at 9 azimuthal positions was assessed using (i) meaningless single sounds and (ii) meaningful sounds presented with two simultaneous distractors. Localisation errors were analysed with a 3-way ANOVA Task × Position × Group.
resultsThe analysis yielded significant main effects of Task, Position and Group. The localisation errors tended to be smaller when localising meaningless single sounds (main effect Task), for items presented at central as compared to peripheral positions (main effect Position), and by firefighters rather than controls (main effect Group). The interactions Position × Group and Task × Position were significant; firefighters performed more accurately at peripheral positions than controls, and meaningless single sounds yielded fewer localisation errors at the periphery than meaningful sounds presented with distractors.
conclusionsProfessional firefighters perform better than controls at explicit localisation of sounds, including in conditions where sound objects need to be segregated from distractors by spatial cues. These results suggest that firefighters have acquired expertise in the explicit and implicit use of auditory spatial cues. The proficiency of firefighters needs to be taken into consideration when planning and carrying out interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.