ReviewBrain sciences2026
Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Spinal Cord Injury: Advances in Stem Cell Therapy.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroinflammation and Graft Survival in Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Therapies for the Central Nervous System.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injuries disrupt the motor, sensory, and autonomic functions routinely carried out by the spinal cord, with injury progressing from primary mechanical damage from the initial trauma to a secondary phase driven by inflammation and cellular cascades. This disruption significantly impacts the patient's ability to perform basic physiological and voluntary functions seen in a normal spinal cord, which often results in long-term disability and dependence on supportive care. Stem cell therapies, including mesenchymal stem cells, neural stem cells, and induced pluripotent stem cells, have been investigated as potential regenerative approaches that may promote repair through neuroprotection, remyelination, and axonal regeneration. Preclinical studies have demonstrated encouraging results in motor and sensory recovery following injury; however, clinical evidence remains limited and variable. Some studies report improvements in motor and sensory function post-injury, with improvements in bladder and bowel management, tissue repair, and other functions. Overall, the outcomes vary based on cell type, delivery method, and the stage of spinal cord injury. The key challenges of stem cell therapy include safety concerns and the limited number of small-scale studies currently available. Additionally, understanding the variability in therapeutic outcomes and identifying optimal treatment conditions are critical steps toward advancing stem cell therapies in spinal cord injury repair. This review aims to characterize and summarize the stem cell approach to the treatment of spinal cord injuries, while also critically highlighting the limitations of current preclinical and clinical evidence, as well as the importance of continued investigation into the long-term and functional recovery processes and possibilities, as well as the patient's quality of life following treatment with stem cells for spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.