ArticleBMJ open2026
Subgroup disparities in the mediating roles of income and social support between education level and depressive symptoms among Chinese middle-aged and older adults: an analysis based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to identify potential subgroups and explore how the mediating effects of income and social support in the relationship between education level and depressive symptoms vary across these groups among middle-aged and older Chinese adults.
designThis study used statistical learning techniques to analyse data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), adopting a cross-sectional approach.
settingThe study analysed data from the 2011 baseline survey of CHARLS. Depressive symptoms were evaluated based on the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale form. Education, social support (informal social support, community support and public support), lifestyle choices (smoke, alcohol and social activity), health conditions (hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, lung disease, heart problem, kidney disease, digestive disease, arthritis, disability, pain and activity limitation), demographic background (urban residence, sex, age, marital status, body mass index and retirement status) were included in the analysis.
participants8161 adults over the age of 45 were included. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the association between educational level and depressive symptoms mediated by income and social support. These associations may vary across subgroups and were measured using a heterogeneous structural equation modelling method with automatic subgroup detection.
resultsThree subgroups were identified and their distinct mediation pathways were revealed. Subgroup 1 had lower depressive symptoms, higher income, better community support and more urban residents. In this subgroup, education was positively associated with income and community support. Higher income and higher community support were associated with fewer depressive symptoms. Subgroup 2 had more severe depressive symptoms, more rural residents and higher rates of chronic conditions and body pain. In this subgroup, neither the direct nor the indirect effects of education were statistically significant. Subgroup 3 had the lowest depressive symptom severity, more rural residents and lower income. In this subgroup, education had a direct protective effect and the indirect pathway through community support was also significant.
conclusionsIncome and community support mediate education-depression associations with subgroup heterogeneity. Policies enhancing education, income and community resources could mitigate depressive symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable (secondary analysis); CHARLS ethical approval: IRB00001052-11015 (Peking University Biomedical Ethics Committee).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.