ArticleBMJ open2026
How can work motivation among primary care physicians be assessed? Development and psychometric validation of the M-PCP scale: a cross-sectional study in the Girona Health Region, Spain.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWork motivation is essential for well-being, performance and retention in general practice. Despite its relevance, no validated instrument is available to assess motivation specifically among primary care physicians (PCPs) or to inform targeted managerial action.
aimTo develop and validate the Motivation Scale for PCP (M-PCP), a theory-driven instrument designed to capture motivational processes relevant to general practice.
methodsThe scale was developed using a structured, theory-based process grounded in Ford's Motivational Systems Theory. Items were generated from existing models, reviewed by experts and tested in a cross-sectional survey of PCPs in the Girona Health Region (Catalonia, Spain). Psychometric analyses included item discrimination, exploratory factor analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling.
resultsAfter removing items with low discrimination or weak loadings, the final 37-item scale showed a clear two-factor structure: goals (continuous improvement, self-care and agency) and perceptions (emotions and contextual agency beliefs). Both constructs showed strong reliability and validity. The model fit was acceptable, and perceptions explained a moderate proportion of variance in goals. These findings indicate that the scale captures key motivational processes linked to daily clinical work.
conclusionsThe M-PCP is a valid tool for assessing work motivation in general practice. By identifying goal-related, emotional and contextual motivational processes, it supports targeted strategies that may enhance clinical performance, continuity of care and physician well-being. Further research should examine its predictive value and applicability across health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.