Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192626›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2026

Quality and patient safety surveillance systems in healthcare settings: a rapid realist review.

Büşra Ertuğrul, Jaspreet Kaur Dullat, Thérèse McDonnell, Marcella O'Dowd, Eilish McAuliffe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Büşra ErtuğrulUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland busra_diker@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-3693
Jaspreet Kaur DullatUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Thérèse McDonnellUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5890-3689
Marcella O'DowdHealth Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Eilish McAuliffeSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-5040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDespite extensive efforts in data collection, quality and safety measurement remains a significant global challenge, with limited understanding of how and under what conditions quality and patient safety surveillance systems function effectively. With the aim of informing the development and effective functioning of quality and patient safety surveillance systems, a rapid realist review was conducted to develop a set of theories that address how, why, for whom and in what context quality and patient safety surveillance systems work.

designRapid realist review to inform recommendations and intervention design for the monitoring and evaluation phase of the QS Signals Project, reported according to Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidelines. DATA SOURCES: Initial programme theories were constructed based on data collected from key articles on quality and patient safety surveillance systems, consultation with an expert panel, informal meetings with a project team charged with developing a quality and patient safety surveillance system for maternal and infant health and a review of the project's planning documents. A three-phase iterative search of PubMed, PsycInfo, CENTRAL, CINAHL and grey literature was conducted, including studies in healthcare settings across all patient groups. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Documents were assessed for relevance (alignment with the theory under test), richness (depth of insight) and rigour (trustworthiness and coherence of data). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Context-mechanism-outcome configurations were generated, iteratively refined and grouped under relevant programme theories to contribute to theory refinement.

resultsThe review process resulted in the development of 11 final programme theories, identifying mechanisms operating at organisational and national levels. Effective systems were enabled by leadership commitment, organisational readiness for change and a supportive safety culture. Clear governance structures, including defined local and national roles, strengthened accountability and coordination. The establishment of multidisciplinary clinical advisory groups facilitated the selection of meaningful safety indicators. Sustainable financial investment and adequate human and technical resources were critical for implementation. Robust data governance frameworks enhanced trust, transparency and appropriate data use. User-centred system design improved data accessibility and usability, while feedback loops supported learning and continuous improvement.

conclusionsQuality and patient safety surveillance systems function most effectively when supported by strong leadership, clear governance structures, adequate resources and a learning-oriented culture that enables the meaningful use of safety data. The findings emerging from this review provide comprehensive, practical and testable systems-level programme theories to inform future research on the development of quality and patient safety surveillance systems across diverse healthcare settings and international contexts.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyQuality of Health CareSafety ManagementHumansHealth & safetyHealth ServicesQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID42192626
PMCPMC13202005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.