Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192623›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2026

Prospective longitudinal observational study at an academic medical centre of lifestyle and cognition in older adults with a cochlear implant or hearing aid: study protocol.

Lisa M Shulman, Kristen Caraher, Michael P Cummings, Anup Mahurkar, Marissa Huffman, Amy Vinyard, Karin F Hoth, Yu-Hsiang Wu, Jacob Oleson, Camille C Dunn

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa M ShulmanDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA lshulman@som.umaryland.edu.
Kristen CaraherDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Michael P CummingsCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Anup MahurkarInstitute for Genome Studies, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Marissa HuffmanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1158-1308
Amy VinyardDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Karin F HothDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Yu-Hsiang WuDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Jacob OlesonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Camille C DunnDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-2073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDementia is a major global health problem with increasing prevalence. Hearing loss has been identified as the most modifiable risk factor for dementia. The Age-Related Cognition and Hearing (ARCH) study is a 3-year prospective, controlled, observational comparative cohort study comparing cochlear implants (Implants) and hearing aids (HAs) for reducing cognitive decline associated with age-related hearing loss (ARHL), based on patient-reported real-world outcomes of auditory function, cognitive performance, listening environment, social interaction and psychosocial well-being. Upon its completion in 2029, the ARCH study is expected to yield significant evidence regarding the comparative effects of two primary hearing interventions-Implants and HAs, to delay and ameliorate cognitive decline associated with ARHL. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 210 older adults are divided into six study subgroups (N=35) with: (1) moderate to profound hearing loss or age-typical normal hearing, (2) use of Implants or HAs and (3) mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or normal cognition. Listeners in the HA groups have hearing loss that is consistent with Implant candidacy and qualification through Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in the USA. The primary study outcome is a 3-year change in real-time patient-reported outcomes collected while participants are in their natural listening environments using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodologies. Secondary outcomes include lab-based audiometric and neuropsychological testing, and patient-reported outcomes of social isolation, loneliness, depression, anxiety and quality of life.Cross-sectional analyses will use factor analysis to reduce EMA items into domains, followed by regression and mixed-effects models to test group differences and identify specific EMA items driving those effects. Machine-learning approaches will complement these models by predicting outcomes, identifying key variables and uncovering data-driven patterns. Longitudinal mixed-effects models will assess how EMA factor scores and cognition change over time and whether real-world EMA experiences mediate cognitive trajectories. Additional analyses will compare real-time EMA responses with retrospective patient-reported outcome measures and laboratory-based cognitive and auditory assessments, with sample size adjusted for up to 10% attrition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All study procedures follow institutional review board requirements and the Declaration of Helsinki at the University of Iowa (IRB# 202403385), with informed consent processes tailored to ensure understanding among participants with MCI. Study findings will be disseminated through a multi-tiered strategy aimed at maximising scientific, clinical and public health impact. Peer-reviewed manuscripts will be submitted to leading journals in audiology, geriatrics, cognitive ageing and public health, with interim and final results presented at national and international conferences and professional society meetings.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsCognitionCognitive DysfunctionHearing AidsHearing LossAcademic Medical CentersAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesResearch DesignAgingCochlear ImplantsCognitionHearingProspective studies

Identifiers

PMID42192623
PMCPMC13202049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.