ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
Clinical Value and Research Prospects of 1024 Matrix Optimization in 64-Slice Cerebral CTA for Perforating Artery Visualisation.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This letter comments on Nagumo et al.'s study evaluating 1024-matrix reconstruction for intracranial perforating artery visualisation in 64-slice cerebral CTA, affirming its cost-effective value for standard CT scanners (https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.70055). We endorse the key finding that 1024-matrix improves small artery detection via higher sampling density, while highlighting the need for cross-vendor validation, workflow impact quantification, and clinical outcome assessment. This simple post-processing strategy is highly scalable, and further multicentre studies are warranted to confirm its universal utility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.