Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192578›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2026

Support for authoritarianism and use of force by and against the federal government in the United States in mid-2025: findings from a nationally representative survey.

Garen J Wintemute, Andrew Crawford, Elizabeth A Tomsich, Mona A Wright, Aaron B Shev, Daniel J Tancredi, Julia P Schleimer, Veronica A Pear, Sonia L Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Garen J WintemuteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. gjwintemute@health.ucdavis.edu.
Andrew CrawfordDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Elizabeth A TomsichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Mona A WrightDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Aaron B ShevDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Daniel J TancrediDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, UC Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Julia P SchleimerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Veronica A PearDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.
Sonia L RobinsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, UC Davis Medical Center, 2315 Stockton Blvd, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring this period of heightened risk for political violence and authoritarian government in the United States (US), there is an urgent need for information on the public's support for authoritarianism and government-initiated violence and its willingness to engage in pro- or anti-government violence.

methodsFindings are from Wave 4, conducted May 23-June 13, 2025, of a nationally representative annual longitudinal survey of adult members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Findings are presented for the cohort as a whole and for demographic and political affiliation subgroups. Outcomes are expressed as weighted prevalences and adjusted prevalence differences, with p-values adjusted for the false discovery rate.

resultsThe survey completion rate was 89.9%. Of 8248 respondents, 15.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 13.9%, 16.1%) strongly or very strongly agreed that "having a strong leader for America is more important than having a democracy." One in 10 (9.6%, 95% CI 8.8%, 10.6%) strongly or very strongly agreed that "the [federal] government should use the military to help enforce its policies in the United States," and 4.4% (95% CI 3.7%, 5.2%) strongly or very strongly agreed with the use of "private armed militia groups" for that purpose. Between 5% and 7% of respondents strongly or very strongly agreed that the federal government should arrest its critics, and about 2% were very or completely willing to personally engage in violence in support of (or opposition to) "government policies or the President" and against individual opponents (or supporters) of the government. Younger respondents tended to be less supportive of democracy as a form of government, more supportive of statements consistent with authoritarianism, and more willing to engage in pro- or anti-government violence. Compared with strong Democrats, "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) Republicans were more supportive of statements consistent with authoritarianism and the current federal government's use of the military and private militia groups but were not more willing personally to engage in violence.

conclusionsIn 2025, substantial minorities of US adults endorsed statements consistent with authoritarianism. Smaller minorities endorsed and were willing to engage in pro- or anti-government violence. These findings call for sustained, concerted action to avert widespread political violence and preserve democracy in the United States.

Indexed as

AuthoritarianismDemocracyDomestic deployment of the militaryDomestic violent extremismLongitudinal surveyMilitia movementPolitical violenceState violence

Identifiers

PMID42192578
PMCPMC13214292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.