Trial reportPharmacology research & perspectives2026
The Prophylactic Effect of Dexmedetomidine 0.008% Versus Brimonidine 0.2% on IOP Elevation After Nd: YAG Laser Capsulotomy.
Trial report in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Posterior capsule opacification (PCO) is a common post-cataract surgery complication treated with Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy, which may cause intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes and threaten vision. Brimonidine and apraclonidine are widely used to prevent such elevations. This prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of topical dexmedetomidine, a novel ophthalmic drop, in preventing IOP rise after Nd:YAG laser treatment. A total of 111 eyes from 89 pseudophakic patients were randomized to receive dexmedetomidine 0.008% or brimonidine 0.2% one h before the procedure. Patients with glaucoma, baseline IOP > 24 mmHg, keratoconus, corneal edema, prior refractive/corneal surgery, or unstable cardiovascular disease were excluded. IOP was measured with air-puff tonometry at baseline, 30 min, 4 h, and 24 h post-laser. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In the dexmedetomidine group, mean IOP values were 16.3 ± 3.6, 14.8 ± 4.7, 17.1 ± 6.2, and 16.7 ± 4.5 mmHg, while in the brimonidine group, they were 16.7 ± 2.9, 13.3 ± 3.9, 13.2 ± 5.5, and 14.2 ± 3.9 mmHg, respectively. At 30 min, brimonidine significantly reduced IOP (p = 0.000), whereas dexmedetomidine did not (p = 0.116). At 4 and 24 h, IOP increased above baseline with dexmedetomidine but decreased with brimonidine (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004). Dexmedetomidine was associated with more IOP spikes > 10 mmHg (9% vs. 2%, p = 0.035) and IOP > 30 mmHg (7% vs. 2%, p = 0.09). No systemic or ocular side effects occurred. Although dexmedetomidine prevented acute IOP surges, its efficacy was inferior to brimonidine. Further studies should explore optimal dosing, formulations, and long-term safety to clarify its prophylactic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.