Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192545›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2026

Comparative evaluation of post-mortem methods for detection of diarrhoea in early-life piglets.

Cecilie Brandt Becker, Malene Kjelin Morsing, Julie Raundahl Laursen, Emma Amalie Kortemand Hansen, Jens Peter Nielsen, Merete Fredholm, Nicole Bakkegård Goecke, Mette Sif Hansen, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Henrik Elvang Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cecilie Brandt BeckerSection for Parasitology and Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark. cebb@sund.ku.dk.
Malene Kjelin MorsingSection for Animal Health and Welfare, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Julie Raundahl LaursenSection for Parasitology and Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Emma Amalie Kortemand HansenSection for Parasitology and Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Jens Peter NielsenSection for Animal Health and Welfare, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Merete FredholmSection for Animal Health and Welfare, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Nicole Bakkegård GoeckeSection for Bacteria and Viruses, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Mette Sif HansenSection for Parasitology and Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Søren Saxmose NielsenSection for Animal Health and Welfare, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.
Henrik Elvang JensenSection for Parasitology and Pathobiology, Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, Frederiksberg C, 1870, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying evidence of peri-mortem diarrhoea during necropsy is important for both clinical herd management and research. In live pigs, diarrhoea is typically assessed by inspection of faecal pools on the pen floor scoring of faecal rectal samples, including cotton-swabs, but these methods depend on the availability of faecal material and are therefore often not applicable at necropsy. This study aimed to evaluate intestinal content characteristics and perianal faecal staining as post-mortem indicators of peri-mortem diarrhoea. These indicators were compared with cotton-swab faecal scoring using faecal dry-matter content as a reference. Furthermore, associations with enteric pathogens detected by PCR were investigated. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 145 pigs from a Danish commercial herd were monitored from birth until 10 weeks of age and euthanised in age-stratified batches for post-mortem examinations. Intestinal content from duodenum, jejunum, ileum, caecum, and colon was evaluated for consistency and colour using categorical scales and compared with perianal faecal staining, faecal scores obtained by the cotton-swab method, faecal dry-matter percentage, and pathogen detections in faecal samples by high-throughput real-time PCR. Colonic content consistency and perianal faecal staining were strongly associated, and in all pigs with watery colonic content a perianal faecal staining was observed. Colonic content consistency corresponded well with faecal dry-matter percentage categories, with mucoid, runny and watery consistencies indicating diarrheic cases (sensitivity: 87%, specificity: 55%). Jejunal content consistency showed little to no association with cotton-swab faecal scores, indicating limited value as an indicator of peri-mortem diarrhoea. Pre-weaning piglets predominantly showed lighter (yellow-green), firmer intestinal contents, whereas post-weaning animals displayed darker and looser contents, particularly in the large intestine. Interobserver reliability was high for consistency scoring (Krippendorff's α > 0.80 across most segments) but low for colour scoring (α < 0.64). Dark colonic content was associated with PCR detection of Lawsonia intracellularis and Brachyspira pilosicoli, while yellow coloration showed an indirect association with detection of Clostridium perfringens α and β2 toxin genes.

conclusionsPost-mortem assessment of colonic content consistency represent a promising, practical and reproducible indicator of peri-mortem diarrhoea, but tending to identify a higher prevalence of diarrheic cases compared to diarrhoea defined by dry-matter percentage. Colonic content consistency also showed a strong association with perianal faecal staining. In contrast, jejunal content consistency showed no diagnostic value as an indicator of peri-mortem diarrhoea. Visual assessment of intestinal content colour demonstrated poor interobserver reproducibility, and any observed associations with enteric pathogens should therefore be interpreted with caution. Overall, these findings support the use of colonic content consistency and perianal faecal staining as necropsy-based indicators for detection of peri-mortem diarrhoea.

Indexed as

Cotton-swab methodFaecal dry-matter contentIntestinal content morphologyNecropsyPerianal faecal staining

Identifiers

PMID42192545
PMCPMC13421096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.