ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Understanding posttraumatic growth in palliative care: a qualitatively driven mixed-methods study using patients' life narratives.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNumerous studies have revealed that the shock engendered by a serious illness can lead to positive psychological changes known as posttraumatic growth (PTG). Most studies examined this phenomenon in early-stage cancer and with the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Our current understanding of the psychological processes behind PTG remains limited. Through life narrative interviews, our study aims (i) to describe profiles of psychological changes of palliative care patients and to highlight characteristics of these changes, and (ii) to link these profiles with quality of life and PTGI.
methodsThis study adopted a multi method design. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients based on the Biographic Narrative Interpretive Method (BNIM) in three centres in Switzerland. An ideal-type analysis was used to establish ideal-types of changes and a thematic analysis to highlight characteristics of these changes. In addition, posttraumatic growth and quality of life were assessed through the PTGI and the McGill Quality of Life-Revised questionnaire (MQOL-R).
resultsIn total, 23 patients participated (13 female, median age = 73). The ideal-type analysis identified four types of psychological changes: (i) "Overcoming adversity" (n = 6), (ii) "Resilience" (n = 7), (iii) "Resigned acceptance" (n = 3), (iv) "Psychological suffering" (n = 7). "Overcoming adversity" and "Resilience" showed higher PTGI scores than "Resigned acceptance" and "Psychological suffering". "Overcoming adversity", "Resilience" and "Resigned acceptance" showed higher MQOL-R scores than "Psychological suffering".
conclusionsRegarding research, life stories offer an innovative way to understand and highlight patient's psychological profiles shaped by past experiences and surpassing the limits of questionnaires. In term of clinical perspective, narrative techniques, known to promote meaning-making, offer valuable opportunities to consider both past and present experiences of patients and thus understand and support their psychological adaptation to face serious illness at the end-of-life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.