ArticleGenome medicine2026
High-fidelity genome and prime editing enabled by the AI-designed openCRISPR-1.
Article in Genome medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-fidelity genome and prime editing enabled by the AI-designed openCRISPR-1.Genome medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRNA-guided nucleases such as CRISPR-Cas9 systems have revolutionized genome engineering by enabling programmable DNA modifications. Although structure-guided and evolution-derived high-fidelity Cas9 variants improve target specificity, they often compromise on-target activity or constrain guide RNA (gRNA) design.
methodsWe performed head-to-head comparisons of OpenCRISPR-1 and Cas9 in human cells using amplicon sequencing, multiplex Digenome-seq, and off-target validation by targeted sequencing. Editing activity was assessed across 28 endogenous loci in HEK293T cells and further evaluated in human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and MRC-5 fibroblasts. To test clinically relevant delivery, Cas9 and OpenCRISPR-1 ribonucleoproteins were delivered using engineered virus-like particles (eVLPs). We also generated OpenCRISPR-based prime editors, OpenCRISPR-PE2 and OpenCRISPR-PE7, and compared them with PE2max and PE7 using pegRNAs and engineered epegRNAs.
resultsHere, we show that OpenCRISPR-1, an AI-designed, Cas9-like nuclease, retains Cas9-level editing efficiency across multiple genomic loci while significantly reducing off-target mutations. Using multiplex Digenome-seq and targeted deep sequencing, OpenCRISPR-1 exhibits up to a 553-fold reduction in off-target mutations compared to Cas9 and achieves off-target indices that match or surpass those of high-fidelity Cas9 variants. OpenCRISPR-1 also sustains robust editing across diverse gRNA formats (GX
conclusionsThese findings establish generative AI-guided protein design as a powerful strategy to overcome the specificity-efficiency trade-off, expanding the genome editing toolkit for both research and therapeutic use, and ushering in a new era of rational protein design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.