ArticleBMC psychology2026
Psychometric properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the Dominican Republic.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is one of the most widely used instruments worldwide for screening and quantifying the severity of depressive symptoms. Its brevity, public-domain availability, and strong empirical support have facilitated its broad adoption across clinical and research settings. However, despite its extensive international use, evidence regarding its psychometric performance in the Dominican Republic remains limited. The absence of locally validated instruments entails critical challenges, including reduced diagnostic accuracy, suboptimal assessment of symptom severity, and constraints on clinical decision-making and context-sensitive mental health research. Establishing the validity and reliability of the PHQ-9 in this context is therefore essential to support both applied screening efforts and epidemiological investigations. The present study examined the internal structure, reliability, and convergent validity evidence of the PHQ-9 in a Dominican adult sample.
methodsA total of 914 adults participated in the study. Dimensionality was evaluated using parallel analysis based on polychoric correlations and exploratory factor analysis with principal axis factoring. Construct validity evidence was further examined through confirmatory factor analysis using the diagonally weighted least squares estimator. Internal consistency was assessed using McDonald's omega and Cronbach's alpha coefficients. Convergent validity evidence was estimated through Spearman correlations between PHQ-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scores.
resultsFindings supported a robust unidimensional structure. Although parallel analysis based on polychoric correlations suggested more than one factor, inspection of the eigenvalue structure, principal axis factor loadings, and confirmatory factor analysis supported retention of a one-factor solution. Reliability indices indicated high internal consistency, with both omega and alpha coefficients exceeding .80. PHQ-9 scores showed strong positive associations with GAD-7 scores, providing convergent validity evidence consistent with the well-documented overlap between depressive and anxiety symptomatology.
conclusionsThe PHQ-9 demonstrates solid psychometric performance in Dominican adults, supporting its use as a reliable screening measure of depressive symptom severity in both research and applied settings. These findings extend cross-cultural validation evidence to a previously underexamined Caribbean context. Future studies incorporating structured clinical interviews and depression-specific gold-standard measures are warranted to further examine diagnostic validity, measurement invariance, and optimal cut-off scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.