Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42192500›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Differential expression of cell death-associated markers may reflect distinct renal lesion patterns in effusive and non-effusive feline infectious peritonitis.

Mustafa Usta, Musa Karaman, Fatma İlhan, Hasan Özen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mustafa UstaDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Türkiye. mustafa_usta45@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3346-9097
Musa KaramanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6721-6111
Fatma İlhanDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0363-6285
Hasan ÖzenDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-2536

Funding

Balıkesir University Scientific Research Co-ordinatorship BAP Project No: 2024/109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a fatal, immune-mediated disease caused by the mutagenic variants of feline coronavirus and manifests as effusive (wet) and non-effusive (dry) clinical forms with distinct pathological features. Although necrosis is a common histopathological finding in FIP, the contribution of specific regulated cell death (RCD) pathway-associated protein expression patterns to tissue injury across different clinical forms remains poorly understood. This study aimed to concurrently and comparatively evaluate apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy-associated cell death, and ferroptosis in the renal tissues of cats with effusive and non-effusive FIP.

methodsArchival kidney samples from cats diagnosed with effusive (n = 18) and non-effusive (n = 18) FIP were included in the study. Immunohistochemistry on tissue sections was performed to assess markers associated with apoptosis by Caspase-3 and Caspase-8, necroptosis-associated signaling by RIP3, autophagy-associated activity by LC3-II, and ferroptosis-associated lipid metabolic susceptibility by ACSL-4. Necrosis was evaluated histomorphologically using a semi-quantitative scoring system, and immunohistochemical expression levels were digitally quantified and statistically compared between the groups.

resultsHistopathological evaluation revealed widespread tubular degeneration and necrosis in both clinical forms, with no significant difference in necrosis scores between the effusive and the non-effusive FIP. In contrast, quantitative differences in RCD-associated marker expression were identified. The non-effusive form exhibited significantly higher Caspase-3, Caspase-8, and LC3-II immunoreactivity, suggesting a higher prevalence of markers associated with caspase-dependent apoptosis and autophagy-associated activity. Conversely, RIP3 and ACSL-4 immunoreactivity were significantly increased in the effusive form, indicating increased expression of markers associated with necroptosis-related and ferroptosis-related processes. All evaluated markers were detected in both disease forms, indicating overlapping expression profiles rather than mutually exclusive pathway involvement.

conclusionCollectively, these findings indicate that RCD-associated proteins are differentially expressed in the effusive and the non-effusive FIP, reflecting quantitative differences in marker expression rather than definitive evidence of pathway-specific activation. While the non-effusive form showed higher expression of markers associated with caspase-dependent apoptosis and autophagy-associated activity, the effusive form exhibited increased expression of proteins related to proinflammatory and oxidative cell death-associated pathways. These findings provide a descriptive immunohistochemical profile of cell death-associated markers in renal lesions of FIP and highlight the need for future studies using complementary molecular and protein-based approaches to further clarify their functional significance.

Indexed as

Cell DeathFeline Infectious PeritonitisKidneyAnimalsApoptosisAutophagyBiomarkersCatsCoronavirus, FelineFemaleFerroptosisImmunohistochemistryMaleNecroptosisNecrosisBiomarkersFeline infectious peritonitis (FIP); ApoptosisFerroptosisNecroptosisNecrosis

Identifiers

PMID42192500
PMCPMC13397654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.