ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Cyberlegs X-Leg at CYBATHLON 2024: insights on the control development of an active transfemoral prosthesis.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Powered lower-limb prostheses aim to enhance the mobility of people with amputations in daily life. The CYBATHLON competition offers an opportunity to evaluate these devices' performance across 10 tasks inspired by everyday activities, such as sitting and standing, avoiding obstacles, walking on uneven terrain and slopes, and climbing stairs. This study reports on the development and deployment of the CYBERLEGs X-Leg, a powered knee-ankle prosthesis equipped with a hierarchical control architecture and task-specific finite state machines (FSMs) during the CYBATHLON 2024 leg prosthesis race. The pilot, an individual with a transfemoral amputation, was trained for approximately 46 h, attempted eight tasks during the competition, and completed three. Overall, the pilot successfully controlled the prosthesis's behavior to execute multiple tasks. The prosthesis delivered stable knee-swing flexion during walking ([Formula: see text]), obstacle-clearance trajectories driven by thigh kinematics, and knee-extension assistance during sit-to-stand ([Formula: see text] Nm). The control design and competition experience underlined the importance of initiating control co-design at earlier development stages and revealed the extensive tuning effort required for a multitask FSM-based system. Performance analysis identified reliance on manual locomotion mode selection, sensitivity in threshold-based FSM transitions, and user discomfort at higher torque levels as key areas for improvement. The competition highlighted both the feasibility and the limitations of FSM-based control when deployed across diverse functional activities. These findings motivate future work on autonomous task recognition, smoother inter-state control blending, the integration of enriched sensing modalities, and human-in-the-loop optimization for user-specific personalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.