ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Implementation of a neuromuscular clinical trial network: a rare disease model for enhancing clinical trial readiness, capacity, and access in Canada.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRare diseases affect over 300 million people globally, yet clinical trial conduct in rare disease populations remains complex due to small patient numbers, geographic dispersion, heterogeneous phenotypes, and limited trial infrastructure. Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) exemplify these challenges. Coordinated trial networks have emerged as a strategy to improve feasibility, access, and trial performance.
methodsGuided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), we conducted a multi-phase qualitative needs assessment involving neuromuscular investigators and clinical trial personnel across Canada (n = 34) and clinical trial personnel (n = 16) across Canada. Data were analyzed using conventional qualitative content analysis to identify barriers, facilitators, and capacity-building needs informing the early implementation of a Canadian Neuromuscular Clinical Trial Network (CTN).
resultsKey barriers included burdensome feasibility processes, limited workforce capacity, lack of centralized trial visibility, and fragmented coordination across stakeholders. Trial personnel highlighted unmet needs in disease-specific training, mentorship, peer networking, and workforce sustainability. Early Neuromuscular CTN strategies, including centralized feasibility triage, a national Community of Practice, one-on-one operational monitoring, mentorship, and alignment with patient and registry infrastructures directly addressed these challenges.
conclusionThe Neuromuscular CTN describes a pragmatic and potentially transferable model for strengthening rare disease clinical trial ecosystems. By ensuring trials not only occur but are optimally supported and performed, coordinated networks can enhance trial readiness, equity of access, and long-term sustainability in rare disease research. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.