ArticleReproductive health2026
Experiences of women with disabilities accessing maternal and newborn health services in Mogadishu, Somalia.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite global commitments to inclusive and equitable maternal and newborn health (MNH) care, women with disabilities in fragile and conflict-affected settings remain overlooked. In Somalia, where maternal mortality is among the highest in the world, women with disabilities face systemic and structural barriers to accessing quality MNH services. This study examined experiences of and perspectives on equitable access to MNH care among women with disabilities in Mogadishu, Somalia.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was conducted in Mogadishu between July and September 2024. We conducted in-depth interviews with women living with physical or visual impairments (n = 8) and with caregivers of women with hearing impairments or intellectual disabilities (n = 4). We also conducted key informant interviews with representatives of national disability organizations (n = 5). Interviews explored pregnancy and birth experiences, access to and quality of MNH services and recommendations for improvement. Data were analyzed using a primarily deductive thematic approach with inductive refinement, informed by Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and Morgan's Gender Analysis Matrix to examine individual, facility and systemic-level determinants.
resultsAt the individual level, women with disabilities faced intersecting challenges related to gender, disability, poverty, unemployment, limited education, and social stigma. These factors pressured them into early marriage and childbirth to secure future caregiving support and social approval. Gendered power relations and unequal access to resources left many women relying on family members for transportation, financial support, and communication with healthcare providers, reducing their autonomy in MNH decision-making. Facility-level barriers included inaccessible infrastructure such as lack of ramps or adjustable beds, poor provider communication especially for patients with hearing impairments or intellectual disabilities, and provider stigma questioning women with disabilities' right to motherhood. These experiences led many women with disabilities to avoid health facilities, relying instead on traditional birth attendants. Systemically, limited disability-inclusive MNH policy implementation, lack of data disaggregated by disability, and inadequate nationwide public awareness further compounded exclusion. Despite these constraints, women with disabilities identified free public health facilities and strong family and community support networks as key enabling factors.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate urgent MNH care gaps for women with disabilities in Mogadishu, Somalia and provide evidence for action. Priorities include disability-inclusive infrastructure, provider training, accessible communication approaches, stronger disability-disaggregated data systems, and women with disabilities participation in planning and service design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.